Tag Archive for public private partnerships

DPAC Impresses Yet Again With $1.8 Million Annual Net Profit

Durham Performing Arts Center Stage

Durham Performing Arts Center Stage

The Durham Performing Arts Center (DPAC), a public/private development led by Garfield Traub Development of Dallas in partnership with Szostak Design of Chapel Hill, reported recently a net income of more than $4.5 million in fiscal 2011-12, with $1.8 million of these funds going to the City of Durham. Under its operating contract with PFM/Nederlander, the City receives 40% of the annual net income from the theater to use for amortizing debt and maintaining and paying other costs related to the City-owned Theater.

DPAC director Bob Klaus reported attendance to be over 417,000, with 25% of attendees being first-time patrons.  Over one-third of the performances were sold out, and the SunTrust Broadway series has already counted almost 11,000 subscribers for the 2012-13 season.

DPAC’s largest attendance for the past season was the return performance of “Wicked”.  82,000 people attended 32 performances, just two years after a successful first run at the DPAC.

Projections for surplus cash flow after operations were originally conservatively estimated at  $400,000 per year, with approximately $160,000 (40%) going to the City.  Fortunately for the DPAC and the City of Durham, the actual results have exceeded the original, purposefully conservative projections by a factor of ten!

Bob Klaus, General Manager of the DPAC, commenting on the performance of the theater, said “the expectations were high, but we beat all expectations”.

Just last month, Pollstar ranked DPAC as #2 among the top 100 best-selling theaters in the world, second only to the Auditorio Nacional in Mexico City, and the #1 top-selling theater in the US, beating out widely-known theater markets like Los Angeles and New York City.

The reputation and performance of the DPAC continues to validate the vision and leadership of the City and its development team which worked so collaboratively throughout the development process.  Public/private partnerships are now being aggressively promoted across the nation, and the Durham Performing Arts Center stands as a paradigm of success of public/private collaboration.

Contact Garfield Traub Development if you would like to see how they can help create your City a successful performing arts center like the DPAC.

Public Private Partnerships Investment and Development Opportunities

Economic reports have shown a stagnant job market and a fairly broad-based contraction in public sector construction during the month of March. This contraction reflects cuts to infrastructure investment structures, now that state and local governments have tightened their belts and the activity of the 2009 Federal fiscal stimulus has played out.

The lack of job and economic growth will continue to impact development activity in most sectors, including public institutions. These institutions cannot (or do not want to) use their tax-exempt bonding capacity to finance real estate assets. Traditional real estate lenders are cautious, have strict underwriting requirements, and in some cases, are using floating rate debt to finance assets. And, the parameters for the CMBS market are still quite conservative.

In order to obtain financing, it may be time to explore non-traditional alternatives. The Credit Tenant Lease form of financing offers a solution through competitively priced, long-term fixed-rate debt
and a faster closing process.  CTL applies to municipal, state, and federal government real estate developments and assets, as well as universities, public schools, healthcare, office, retail and specialty real estate.

CTL loans are based on the investment-grade credit rating of the tenant. The real estate is collateral and secondary in the credit matrix. These loans give owners, developers, and clients with investment-grade credit tenants the opportunity to finance the development and hold the property for the long term. With proceeds up to 100% LTV, and long-term, non-recourse debt, CTL loans minimize equity requirements and limit liability.

The current capital market environment offers an excellent time to take advantage of the benefits offered through the CTL loan program. Each CTL loan is structured as a private placement bond. Investor demand for these bonds exceeds supply, driving down loan spreads. This, in combination with low Treasury rates, has pricing at or near historic lows.

CTL loans offer the following advantages:

•  Loan proceeds up to 100% LTV
•  Non-recourse debt
•  Very competitive rates
•  Long-term, fixed-rate debt
•  Assumable debt on sale or transfer
•  Ability to prepay loan (at make-whole)
•  Rate lock up to 60 days prior to closing
•  Construction/Perm loan opportunity

Mesirow Financial specializes in CTL financing, utilizing direct access to CTL debt sources through its 120-person institutional sales group covering 1,200 institutional accounts.  This coverage facilitates real-time, accurate, and competitive pricing with superior execution.  With these advantages, Mesirow strives to provide its clients with optimal pricing and the most favorable terms.

Garfield Traub has an abundant amount of experience in financing public developments despite the economic downturn throughout the U.S. If you would like to learn more about how your public agency can get your essential developments financed contact Garfield Traub and we will be happy to help.

Public Private Partnerships in the Travel Industry

What makes a city great? What sets a city apart from others in attracting new industry, new growth, civic pride, and robust economic development? We have found over and over that the magnet that draws business and tourism is most often found in the heart of the city, its convention center. Although the travel industry, like so many other facets of an economy, is vulnerable to the economic cycles that periodically impact the nation, it is vital for a city to be able to constantly attract conventions, association meetings, exhibitions, leaders of industry, and tourism in general.

Top Factors in Choosing an Event Location

Source: 2006 Meetings Market Report, Meetings and Conventions Magazine

Certainly, being located in an inviting climate and an accessible part of a region and the nation is important to a city’s success. So, too, is having modern infrastructure and attractions, such as museums, performing arts centers, sports, and entertainment activities to enhance the allure for business associations, as well as the casual traveler. Keep in mind also that the first introduction to a city for prospective business leaders who might decide to relocate headquarters or establish regional offices in your city may be their experience when they attend a conference or convention at your convention center.

When reviewing the top reasons for choosing a particular event location, group planning experts determined some years ago that second only to a city having a modern convention center with the available meeting space needed by its group,
is the number of quality hotel rooms attached or adjacent to the convention center. If your city has no modern and attached or adjacent headquarters hotel with “room blocks” available for a majority of convention delegates, planners are likely to select another city that offers that critical combination. This is supported by numerous exit interviews of groups that cite the lack of a dedicated onsite hotel as the reason they selected one convention destination over another.

Approximately 50 cities have successfully built, expanded, or modernized their convention centers and developed connected headquarters hotels over the past decade, and about half of them have used public private partnerships to accomplish those developments. Surprisingly, about another 50 cities have tried
and failed to develop the headquarters hotels so essential to ensuring the success of their convention centers. Those cities that succeeded in completing their developments have several characteristics in common, just as those that have failed have very similar stories about why they are still on the outside looking in. What separates success from failure in funding this vital economic engine for a city?

First, this undertaking can be highly politicized and controversial. The public must be informed as to the benefits to the city of the development, and all-too-common disinformation campaigns by narrow interests opposing such a development should be addressed head-on. There is room for debate about the right approach for a city to take in funding, developing, operating, and maintaining the facilities given political, legal, and economic factors, but there is no denying the benefits of having competitive, modern public assembly facilities and related headquarters hotels. Those cities that have recognized this and value their ability to “sell” their city as a convention destination, know they must build and maintain their public assembly facilities, which must include a headquarters hotel, to be successful.

Tangible benefits of such a development include tens of thousands of new annual visitors, who stay two or three days in the city and spend money on hotels, transportation, dining, entertainment, and shopping. Millions of dollars in annual visitor spending creates jobs, generates substantial tax revenue, and stimulates development of related, private mixed-use development. The incremental travel-related tax revenue is more “profitable” than property taxes, due to the limited burden of visitors on city infrastructure—like police and fire departments, schools, and hospitals—when compared to community residents. Increased tourism-related tax revenue bolsters other revenue to operate the entire city and reduces reliance on resident property taxes.

Returns to the public from a development of this nature are real and substantial—but public investment is required to realize the benefits. Too many cities, however, have failed to recognize or have tried to deny the obvious—the substantial cost of designing and constructing a full-service, first-class headquarters hotel including all the extra meeting space required, versus the limitations on adequate revenue to pay the mortgage and provide an appropriate return to the owner. Those cities too often succumb to the “best sounding” solution—the promise of little to no public financial support asked by developers,
who hope to be selected and to amend their low-budget targets by asking the
city for more money once plans and pricing show the real costs. The loss of time associated with a failed procurement alone hurts the city immeasurably when conventions are lost for three, five, or ten years. But the loss of confidence in civic leadership can be even more devastating through dashed community hopes and aspirations and broken promises to develop those facilities.

Overton Hotel and Conference Center

Overton Hotel and Conference Center, Lubbock, TX

Two recent examples of public private partnerships that have been boons to their cities are the Overton Hotel and Conference Center in Lubbock, Texas, and the Durham Performing Arts Center in downtown Durham, North Carolina. The Overton in Lubbock is that city’s first full-service, first-class conference hotel, situated across University Boulevard from Texas Tech University. It not only serves as Lubbock’s modern conference center, but is also the teaching facility for one of Texas Tech’s restaurant hotel investment management classes. The project financing included grants funded by foundations supporting Texas Tech, a Lubbock city bond issue, plus equity and debt raised by the private development team.

Since the Overton Hotel and Conference Center opened in August 2009, Lubbock has been able to attract associations that have either never hosted an event in Lubbock, or have not done so in many years. Examples of these groups are the Texas Apartment Association, the Texas Payroll Conference, and the Texas Hospital Association. In Fiscal Year 2010-2011, 17 of the top 20 room night-producing events hosted in Lubbock used the Overton Hotel and Conference Center as their headquarters facility. The Overton Hotel and Conference Center has allowed the Visit Lubbock staff to provide decision-makers with more options in facility space and facility features. Lubbock is also seeing an increase in repeat business from groups that experienced the first-class service provided
by the Overton staff.

Durham Performing Arts Center (DPAC)

Durham Performing Arts Center - Durham, NC

Similarly, the Durham Performing Arts Center, or DPAC, is a public private partnership in which the capital necessary to finance the facility included Durham city bonds amortized by revenue from a portion of citywide hotel occupancy taxes, a grant from Duke University, and naming rights Theater operations and promotion of events and talent are handled by a private sector theater operator. Profits are shared between the operator and the city, with the operator guaranteeing a minimum number of annual events and no operating loss risk for the city. This award-winning touring Broadway Theater was ranked number 9 in attendance among U.S. theaters by Pollstar in 2010, and number 4 in 2011, and generates $28 million in annual economic impact to the City of Durham.

Financing public assembly facilities and related hotels is an activity that mayors and city councils, even city managers, may undertake only once in their public lives. The costs of designing and building these facilities are significant, and the economics of operating and paying for these facilities is complex to grasp. Hence the need for public private partnerships and the selection of well-qualified developers, consultants, and other specialists to help lead the city in understanding these facilities and their financial structures and to help ensure their successful completion. We are aware of a number of Texas cities that are wisely taking these steps in considering or planning public assembly facilities and headquarters hotels, following the example of cities like Lubbock and Durham.
Ray Garfield is a principal of Garfield Traub, a development services firm focused exclusively on essential public facilities. For more information, please visit www.garfieldtraub.com or e-mail rgarfield@garfieldtraub.com.

Click here for the original print out as seen in the April Edition of Texas Town and City Magazine: Private-Public Partnerships in the Travel Industry

EB-5 Program – Creating Foreign Investment With Visas

In the interest of fair and balanced reporting, we thought this April 15, 2012 New York Times article by Ann Lee of Demos on “Visas-for-Dollars” is deserving of everyone’s attention.  As our firm intends to be in the market later this year and into next year raising EB-5 funds for a portion of the financing of a new hotel and conference center for a California city, we want to do what we can to draw attention to the need for transparency in all transactions.

Making Visas-for-Dollars Work

By ANN LEE as posted in The New York Times
Published: April 15, 2012

EB-5 Program Creating VisasAMONG the most popular tools for attracting foreign investment to the United States is the EB-5 program. It seems like the perfect win-win: any foreigner who invests between $500,000 and $1 million here, and creates at least 10 domestic jobs from that investment within two years, gets a green card.

Given how many high-worth investors are clamoring to enter the United States, the EB-5 program could have a significant effect on American unemployment. Indeed, it has brought in some $1 billion over the last fiscal year, and the President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness has called for the EB-5 program to be “radically” expanded over the next few years.

Unfortunately, the program is so rife with fraud and corruption that it could actually have the opposite impact and deter investment. To regain its credibility, the program must make a number of changes to enable more transparency and demand more competence from its operators.

The most egregious problems with the EB-5 program can be found in its 218 regional centers, which work with private-sector brokers to identify local investments and direct foreign participants to them. Examples abound of centers and brokers playing down risky investments and misrepresenting how the program works, including a promise that EB-5 investments are guaranteed by the federal government — when the government in fact does nothing of the sort. Many investments have failed to create the required 10 jobs and even gone bankrupt, leaving the investor without his money or his green card.

While many EB-5 regional centers have solid records, a disturbing number have directed investor money to risky projects and companies that pay little to no return, overseen by brokers who get a commission regardless of how the investment plays out.

Aside from accusations of outright fraud, there is also a clear lack of understanding among government administrators about how to manage an investment program. As a result, they often approve businesses that are simple to understand, like a condo development or a grocery store, but whose business models don’t generate enough profit to hire workers, while rejecting more sophisticated businesses that stand a greater potential of generating profits and jobs.

For the time being, these problems haven’t turned the tide of interest in the EB-5 program. But that could change: recent high-profile investigations by Reuters and Businessweek, as well as a warning against fraudulent brokers by the Chinese Supreme People’s Court, could start having a significant deterrent effect, especially since other countries, like Canada, are following America’s lead with their own versions of the program.

Fortunately, the solutions are straightforward. The federal government needs to rein in freewheeling brokers with heavier penalties for misrepresenting investments, hire more business-savvy administrators and make the entire process more transparent, so that applicants know why their money was accepted or rejected.

The EB-5 program has a lot of promise to reduce unemployment, and the White House is right to call for its expansion. Rather than end it, let’s fix it.

Ann Lee is a senior fellow at Demos and the author of “What the U.S. Can Learn From China.”

If you would like to see how Garfield Traub Development can help you get your essential developments financed with the EB-5 program, please contact us.

EB-5 Money – Commercial Real Estate Funding Solution

Garfield Traub Development is pleased to call your attention to a very informative article authored by Bob Voelker of the Dallas based law firm, Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C.  Bob is one of the most respected real estate attorneys in the country, and well versed in development financing methodologies including EB-5 and New Markets Tax Credits among many others.  This article on EB-5 essentials is very timely.  Accessing cost efficient international funds as part of an overall capital structure for essential facilities for the public sector enables projects to not only proceed but to succeed.  Indeed, we at Garfield Traub are using these funds to complete funding on target developments across the nation, especially hotels and conference centers in key cities.  As accessing these funds in China and in other nations is becoming more and more active and a number of new developments are in the international marketplace simultaneously, we only consider using this funding for developments in first or second tier communities, where those communities are also investing in these P3 or Public/Private ventures, and where other “quality” elements exist to establish a strong story to enable strong acceptance.

Please enjoy this article.

Bob Voelker: Foreigner Investors Filling Real Estate Funding Gap

Several local real estate projects are securing gap financing by luring foreign investors to create American jobs in exchange for U.S. visas. Most of this money is coming from China under a U.S. Customs and Immigration Service (USCIS) program known as EB-5. As this is a financing tool relatively new to North Texas, I have laid out the basics of EB-5 below.

Q. What is an EB-5 Visa?

A. EB-5 is an immigrant investor visa category created for foreign nationals who invest in a U.S. business that creates at least 10 full-time jobs. An EB-5 applicant will receive a visa for himself or herself, his or her spouse, and all of their children under the age of 21. The USCIS will issue a conditional visa within five-eight months of application by an EB-5 investor, as long as the investor and the project are qualified. If the investment project fulfills the job creation criteria after two years, the investor can obtain permanent resident status, and can apply for U.S. citizenship in five years.

Q. What is the criteria  for an EB-5 Visa?

A. In order to qualify for an EB-5 Visa, an investor must invest at least $500,000 in a “targeted employment area” (as discussed below) in an enterprise that will create at least 10 new full-time jobs for U.S. citizens and legal residents per $500,000 investment. Foreign investors usually purchase limited partnership interests in a limited partnership made up of multiple investors seeking EB-5 visas, with the partnership being controlled by the EB-5 Regional Center (which in essence acts as the “syndicator”). This limited partnership then invests in the entity that controls the project.

Q. What is a Regional Center?

A. A Regional Center is an entity created to sponsor projects for EB-5 investors and approved by the USCIS. There are currently more than 175 Regional Centers.

Q. How are EB-5 investors secured?

A. The EB-5 Regional Centers have well developed networks of foreign brokers and licensed emigration agents who raise financing for EB-5 projects, usually through seminars attended by foreign investors.

Q. What are EB-5 investors looking for in an EB-5 investment?

A. EB-5 investors are looking to obtain two primary objectives: 1) their visas, which are obtained through the project creating the number of jobs promised in the business plan, and 2) a reasonable likelihood of the return of their investment in five or six years. Secondarily, EB-5 investors and the Regional Centers are looking for a small rate of return on their investment—frequently from 1-5 percent plus, depending on the structure, a small back-end interest in the project (which can be subordinated to debt repayment and returns to other equity partners).

Q. What is a Targeted Employment Area?

A. A targeted employment area is any city, county, census tract or other geographical area or political subdivision accepted by the USCIS that has an unemployment rate that’s more than 150 percent of the national average rate, or a “rural area.” A rural area is an area outside a metropolitan statistical area or outer boundary of any city or town having a population of 20,000 or more. Although at first blush this would seem to allow the use of EB-5 financing only for rural projects and urban projects in impoverished areas, we have found after evaluating a large number of proposed project sites that a large percent of urban areas qualify.

Q. What is the process?

A. The process of qualifying a project for EB-5 investment is as follows. It typically takes about nine to 12 months to complete:

• Determine if the site qualifies as a targeted employment area.

• Provide project information including description and proformas to the Regional Center.

• Negotiate a term sheet with the Regional Center outlining the amount and terms of the investment. The Regional Center hires an economist who determines the number of jobs that will be directly or indirectly created by the project (and thus sizing the total EB-5 capital limit).

• Work with other debt and equity financing sources to make certain the EB-5 terms and conditions coordinate with other financing terms.

• The project sponsor and the Regional Center negotiate the investment documents.

• The Regional Center (working together with the project sponsor) prepares the investment partnership documentation and an offering memorandum and business plan outlining the investment and submits same to the USCIS for approval.

• The documents are translated into the foreign language and the Regional Center markets the investment overseas through foreign brokers.

• The foreign investors make application to the USCIS for their visas and place deposits in escrow with the Regional Center.

• The USCIS processes the visa applications.

• The USCIS approves the visa applications.

• The approved foreign investors close their investment in the investment partnership, which in turn invests in the project partnership. These investments are sometimes made while the visa applications are being processed, but are returnable if visa approval is denied by the USCIS.

Securing these funds overseas is a complex and time-consuming process, but for real estate projects that will be in development for a lengthy period, and where the EB-5 raise will be in excess of $5 million, the process may be worthwhile given EB-5’s low cost of capital (versus traditional real estate mezzanine debt/equity).

To find out more about how EB-5 money can help you fund your commercial real estate developments, contact Garfield Traub, 972-716-3838.

Durham Performing Arts Center (DPAC) Proves Big City Benefits Once Again

Durham Performing Arts Center (DPAC)

Durham Performing Arts Center - Durham, NC

If you were reading the Garfield Traub Public Private Partnerships blog recently you would have seen our last article titled, “Dallas Convention Center Hotel Development Brings Big Benefits to City.” There we explained how convention center hotel developments are boosting city revenue and bringing in new visitors and business in large numbers. Additionally, you may have read towards the end of the article about performing arts centers allowing cities to reap similar benefits. A press release from the Durham Performing Arts Center (DPAC) was released yesterday titled, “DPAC Gets Ready to Celebrate 3 Monumental Years,” reinforcing our point even more.

The DPAC press release cited that the Durham Performing Arts Center is celebrating multiple achievements in the month of November, including being named once again in the top 10 theater venues in attendance in America, the New York Times Travel section recognizing the DPAC as “an integral part of the city of Durham’s continuing success,” and the celebration of the DPAC’s 3rd Anniversary on November 30, 2011.

In a previous article titled, “Garfield Traub Development DPAC Proves Skeptics Wrong” we noted that trade publication Pollstar named DPAC #2 in the U.S. for attendance, and #4 internationally in 2011 Pollstar’s Top 100 Theater Venues for ticket sales. The DPAC has stated that, “In the U.S., DPAC is on the heels of the Coliseum at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas- a theater often referred to as the home of the greatest entertainers of the world, and the legendary Fox Theatre in Atlanta. Trailing DPAC is #4) Nokia Theatre L.A. Live , LA, CA #5) Beacon Theatre, NY, NY #6) Broward Ctr. Au-Rene Theater, Fort Lauderdale, FL, #7) Radio City Music Hall NY, NY, #8) Verizon Theatre at Grand Prairie, Grand Prairie, TX, #9) Orpheum Theater, Omaha, NE and #10) Dreyfoos Theater, West Palm Beach, FL.”

With a new theater development like the Durham Performing Arts Center being built in a down economy, like the Dallas Convention Center development, taxpayers and some city officials were skeptical. However, as time has proven again and again, it is these developments that, if planned well, can make the difference how a city weathers and how quickly a city recovers from a down economy.

Durham Performing Arts Center Representative Reginald James Johnson was recently asked by KCPW radio station, Utah’s first and only 24-hour commercial-free news and information radio station, if there was an economic benefit to building the DPAC. Mr. Johnson replied by saying, “The Durham Performing Arts Center opened in bad economy in 2008, and when the DPAC first opened they sold out and restaurants surrounding it were thriving despite others in most other cities plummeting in sales.” And Schuster Center Representative

Schuster Center

Schuster Center Dayton, OH

Ken Neufeld answered that same KCPW question by saying, “Dayton, Ohio was behind the scene and needed to be put in a favorable position to recruit businesses and people. Statistically, arts amenities are one of the top three things people are looking for when moving or coming there. Over half of ticket sales for the Lion King Broadway show were made up of those who had never been to theater before, thus bringing in new customers for all businesses located around the Center. Performing arts centers are an infrastructure that smart cities have to have, and it has paid off for Dayton a lot.”

If you would like to know how you might be able to get a Performing Arts Center like the DPAC developed in your city contact Garfield Traub.

Utah Performing Arts Center Development Case Strengthened By City Successes

During a recent interview with KCPW, Utah’s first and only 24-hour commercial-free news and information radio station, three theater experts from Denver, Durham, N.C. and Dayton, Ohio discussed why theaters such as the proposed Utah Performing Arts Center in Salt Lake City are vital to the success of a City in a down economy and over the long term. The cost estimate for the proposed Utah Performing Arts Center is approximately $100 million, but other big theaters have made up for their initial cost in tenfold benefits to their cities.

A yearlong study commissioned by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City and conducted by Garfield Traub Swisher, the Utah-based company selected by the RDA in October 2009 to develop the theater, identified a bevy of cultural and economic benefits the proposed Utah Performing Arts Center would bring to the capital city.

Here is a sample of what each expert had to say about their Performing Arts Center experiences:

Ken NeufeldSCHUSTER CENTER  REPRESENTATIVE KEN NEUFELD, President and CEO of the Victoria Theatre Association, operator of the Benjamin and Marian Schuster Center, the Victoria Theatre, and the Loft Theatre in Dayton, Ohio

KCPW: How did your community pay for your facilities?

Ken Neufeld: Public Private Partnership

  • $40 Million in Philanthropy
  • State, County and City Supporters
  • Regional Transit Authority with Federal Money
  • Bonds

KCPW: Was there an economic benefit to building your Performing Arts Center?

Ken Neufeld: “Dayton, Ohio was behind the scene and needed to be put in favorable position to recruit businesses and people. Statistically, arts amenities are one of the top three things people are looking for when moving or coming there. Over half of ticket sales for the Lion King Broadway show were made up of those who had never been to theater before, thus bringing in new customers for all businesses located around the Center. Performing arts centers are an infrastructure that smart cities have to have and it has paid off for Dayton a lot.”

KCPW: Did the new performing arts center take away from the other local arts facilities and are you just ticket shifting or actually getting more visitors?

Ken Neufeld: “There is no crossover. We know from studying our audience what other kinds of venues they go to and are engaged in. When we did “Wicked” the Symphony actually captured more buyers as new subscribers from the “Wicked” audience then we did. So, it actually went in the reverse and we developed more of an audience for them. Our market is very different from others.”

KCPW: You mentioned you have an historic theater already. Why invest in a larger theater if you already have a theater that can bring touring productions into town?

Ken Neufeld: “The idea of having a retrofitted old theater is never really an acceptable option. It is like a city that looks at their sewer system and says, “We can patch up those cast-iron pipes, they will last another 10 years.” But that is really not the smart idea in the long run. You really have to look at these buildings as part of a city’s infrastructure, and these arts centers are a part of a smart modern city’s infrastructure in order to attract businesses and people to move to the community. These amenities help people to do this.”

KCPW: Final advice as to whether the Utah Performing Arts Center should be built in this economy.

Ken Neufeld: In times of a recession you can benefit at getting a facility at a better budget point. In 30 years when everyone is still enjoying this facility and it is doing everything it should be doing, I don’t think anyone is going to be talking about the $100 million bond issue at that point. They are going to be slapping themselves on the back saying ‘wasn’t that a great decision?’”

 

Reginald James JohnsonDURHAM PERFORMING ARTS CENTER REPRESENTATIVE REGINALD JAMES JOHNSON, Interim Director of the Durham, North Carolina Department of Community Development

KCPW: How did your community pay for your facilities?

Reginald James Johnson: Public Private Partnership

 

  • $30 Million in certificates of participation paid by hotel occupancy taxes
  • Naming Rights Partnerships
  • Duke University provided $7.5 million

KCPW: Was there an economic benefit to building your Performing Arts Center?

Reginald James Johnson: The Durham Performing Arts Center opened in bad economy in 2008, and when the center first opened they sold out and restaurants surrounding it were thriving despite others in most other cities plummeting in sales.”

KCPW: You mentioned you have an historic theater already. Why invest in a larger theater if you already have a theater that can bring touring productions into town?

Reginald James Johnson: “Because we did not have one that could actually hold a Broadway play in Durham. Stage requirements did not accommodate all the equipment a Broadway theater needs in the historical theater and we wanted to have a Broadway play come to Durham.”

KCPW: Is this the right time? The economic climate is not great, as we all know. If you had to make this choice again in your respective cities, would you do this now?

“We can’t pull back in a down economy. Everything can’t just come to a halt. We have to keep moving forward regardless. We in Durham look toward the future and we have visions of what we want the quality of life to look like. And even now, we are doing the largest revitalization project we have ever done. We need to move forward in times like these because life goes on, and our children and our children’s children need to have something to benefit from.”

 

Randy WeeksDENVER CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS RANDY WEEKS, President of the Denver Center for the Performing Arts

KCPW: How did your community pay for your facilities?

Randy Weeks: Public Private Partnership

 

 

  • Naming Rights Partnerships
  • Bond Issues
  • Facilities Development Admission Tax (FDA) – This tax comes from each ticket sold to service bonds, this tax has paid for the facility two times over

KCPW: Did the new performing arts center take away from the other local arts facilities and are you just ticket shifting or actually getting more visitors?

Randy Weeks: “The vibrancy of the local theater scene is really quite incredible and flourishing. We are feeding the cultural economy. The more exposure people have to an art form the more they want it.”

KCPW: Is this the right time? The economic climate is not great, as we all know. If you had to make this choice again in your respective cities, would you do this now?

Randy Weeks: “The main advice I would give is you should have done it 10 years ago, and putting it off more is just going to cost more. With the older structures and little amenities people just don’t want to go downtown anymore.”

In order for this state-of-the-art theater to be completed, the Utah Performing Arts Center needs to have the support of sponsors like you who would like to add their name as a “UPAC Playbill Partner” and receive regular project reports, upcoming UPAC Newsletters and exclusive, partners-only opportunities!

To see how other existing Performing Arts Centers have benefited their cities, visit the Utah Performing Arts Center website.

Garfield Traub Public Private Development Group Growing Fast

The term Public Private Development is quickly rising in popularity due to the success of those using Public Private Partnerships to obtain much needed funds to renew government infrastructure, improve transportation, and construct new projects that state, local and Federal governments could not afford before due to budget constraints.

Due to the importance and rapid growth of using Public Private Partnerships in today’s developments, Garfield Traub Development decided to create a Public Private Development group within LinkedIn, the world’s largest professional network. The group specializes in helping public/private sector decision makers involved in building developments to network with others in both the decision making and facilitation process of their developments.

“I am extremely happy with what our Public Private Development LinkedIn group has accomplished thus far. The quality of material that has been posted by members has exceeded my expectations,” said Mr. Garfield. “This has turned into such an impactful tool for those like me who are involved in the development process and for those looking for others to assist them in their developments.”

The group was started by Garfield Traub six months ago and already has more than 550 members comprised of public and private sector decision makers specializing in site identification and acquisition, zoning and entitlement, financing, investment, design and construction, leasing, management and asset management, as well as professionals such as general contractors, architects, engineers, specialty consultants, investment bankers, mortgage brokers, lenders and investors.

“Our goals are for professionals to get answers to their questions and for them to have the ability to give answers and suggest resources to help each other to succeed. This is especially important in this economic environment where constrained government budgets have made financing and development of essential facilities quite difficult,” said Mr. Garfield. “It is more important than ever for us to find ways to come together as we emerge from this recession and help each other and our clients succeed.

If you or anyone you know are involved in any part of the commercial real estate development process and would like to contribute or ask questions involving public private partnerships, you too can join Garfield Traub’s Public Private Development group on LinkedIn today for free. For more information on how you can get your public developments financed and completed, please visit the Garfield Traub website.

Garfield Traub Development DPAC Proves Skeptics Wrong

Durham Performing Arts Center (DPAC)

Durham Performing Arts Center - Durham, NC

The Durham Performing Arts Center (DPAC), developed by Garfield Traub, is getting a lot of media attention lately with its key role in the transformation of downtown Durham into a thriving destination with an array of restaurants, entertainment and shopping. Although some openly doubted the project in the past, many of those same people are now retracting their criticism and praising the development instead.

“We are proud of what DPAC has accomplished for the redevelopment of Durham,” said Garfield Traub Principal Greg Garfield. “Durham’s downtown dining and shopping experience has been greatly enhanced by the DPAC, and we at Garfield Traub are glad that we had the opportunity to lead the development.”

In a July article entitled “DPAC: Proof is in the profit,” one local correspondent admitted he wrongly thought in 2007 that the Durham City Council was “digging itself into yet another financial hole” with the project. Now that same reporter has gone on to say, “bully for all the people who gave life to DPAC. You have a big, brassy hit on your hands. It couldn’t have happened to a more deserving burg.”

Additionally, a recent article in The New York Times Travel section attributed a big part of Durham’s success to the development of the Durham Performing Arts Center.  And if that were not enough, trade publication Pollstar announced DPAC as ranking second nationally in theater attendance for the first quarter.  This is a huge honor for Durham, which is competing against other widely-known theater markets like Los Angeles and New York City.

The Durham Performing Arts Center operator confirms that the design of the DPAC ensures there isn’t a bad seat in the house. It is this design that keeps popular performances such as Broadway favorites Wicked, Billy Elliot and RENT, comedians and actors Bill Cosby and Al Pacino, and musical acts such as Leonard Cohen and B.B. King coming and attendance so high. And with a highly-attended theater comes many businesses that have flocked to the area to reap the benefits from the many concert-goers the theater brings.

“Garfield Traub was instrumental in the planning for the DPAC,” said Alan DeLisle, Assistant City Manager for Economic and Workforce Development (2002 – 2009). “The City of Durham has benefited greatly from their leadership and expertise in this process.”

Read more about the development details of the Durham Performing Arts Center. To learn how you can get your public infrastructure financed and developed contact Garfield Traub.

Study: Downtown Salt Lake City theater would attract 123K new visitors to Utah

Broadway Theater Rendering in Salt Lake

A cutaway view, looking north, of a plan for a Broadway-style theater along Main Street in downtown Salt Lake City.

By Jared Page, Deseret News

SALT LAKE CITY — A theater capable of hosting first-run touring Broadway shows would attract more than 123,000 new visitors to Salt Lake City each year and serve as an economic catalyst on Main Street, according to a study released Tuesday.

The yearlong study commissioned by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City identifies a bevy of cultural and economic benefits the proposed Utah Performing Arts Center would bring to the capital city.

The study was conducted by Garfield Traub Swisher, the Utah-based company selected by the RDA in October 2009 to develop the theater.

The developers say the Utah Performing Arts Center would meet the pent-up demand for first-run touring Broadway productions in Utah. Currently, space and scheduling limitations prevent Salt Lake City from attracting such shows until their seventh, eighth or ninth runs.

“The Lion King,” for example, came to Utah 13 years after it opened on Broadway, according to the study. The show was a huge hit, running for seven weeks and grossing $8 million in sales. It also generated more than $500,000 in sales-tax revenue, $500,000 in stagehand job wages, $200,000 in local musician job wages and another $500,000 in facility rental income.

Garfield Traub Swisher estimates a $200 million to $500 million one-time economic boost during construction of the 148,000-square foot performing arts center. The developers also estimate $9.4 million a year in ongoing economic output from the theater.

In October 2008, Salt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker announced plans to build the Utah Performing Arts Center at approximately 135 S. Main. The project, which will feature a 2,500-seat theater, is estimated to cost between $88 million and $98 million.

The complete report can be downloaded at www.slcrda.com.

  • Veteran Owned Business Directory, Get your free listing, now!